Legal Opinion
Live Stock State Bank v. Forrest City Grocer Co.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 1, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The testimony in this case is sufficient to support a finding that the Midwest Hay Company, a copartnership engaged in selling hay and grain in Kansas City, was indebted to the Forrest City Grocer Company. While so indebted, the grocer company ordered two cars of hay from the hay company. These cars were shipped from Kansas City on May 3 and. May 4, and in due course reached Forrest City.
The bills of lading were made in the name of the hay company, and were indorsed by it. Separate drafts were drawn by the hay company for each car of hay, and the drafts were identical, except as to date and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Taft v. Quinsigamond National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Cox Wholesale Grocery Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
- Johnson v. T. M. Dover Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- May v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
- Guaranty Bank Trust Company v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Guaranty Bank Trust Company v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926