Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hamilton v. McKenna

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1915No. 19,422; No. 19,423Published

Appeal from Anderson district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1DissentDawson, J.

(dissenting) : The words were slanderous and the petition was good as against a demurrer. (Henicke v. Griffith, 29 Kan. 516; Hess v. Sparks, 44 Kan. 465, 24 Pac. 979; The State v. Grinstead, 62 Kan. 593, 64 Pac. 49; Grubb v. Elder, 67 Kan. 316, 72 Pac. 790; Bashford v. Wells, 78 Kan. 295, 96 Pac. 663; Cooper v. Seaverns, 81 Kan. 267, 105 Pac. 509; Gano v. Cunningham, 88 Kan. 300, 128 Pac. 372; Neosho County v. Spearman, 89 Kan. 106, 130 Pac. 677; Brock v. Francis, 89 Kan. 463, 473, 131 Pac. 1179; Roberts v. Pendleton, 92 Kan. 847, 142 Pac. 289; Martin v. The Picayune, 115 La. 979, 40 South.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Julian v. Kansas City Star Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Hayes v. Press Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Cooper v. SeavernsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. State v. Pool GrinsteadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Gano v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API