Smith v. Faust
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Prince, J., Hampton, Action by Maud M. Smith, as administratrix, • against I. P. Faust and another, as receivers. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. cites: 26 S. C. 506; 6 S. C. 159; 1 Strob. Eq. 103; 5 S. C. 90; 20 Cyc. 446; 103 Iowa 378; 64 Md. 513; 64 Ala. 392; 31 Ala. 149; 135 111. 92; 56 Mo. App. 325; 64 N. H. 99; 63 N. H. 577; 16 N. H. 168; 122 N. C. 587; 84 N. C. 434; 24 Cent. Dig. Tit.
Read the full summary
Before Prince, J., Hampton, Action by Maud M. Smith, as administratrix, • against I. P. Faust and another, as receivers. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. cites: 26 S. C. 506; 6 S. C. 159; 1 Strob. Eq. 103; 5 S. C. 90; 20 Cyc. 446; 103 Iowa 378; 64 Md. 513; 64 Ala. 392; 31 Ala. 149; 135 111. 92; 56 Mo. App. 325; 64 N. H. 99; 63 N. H. 577; 16 N. H. 168; 122 N. C. 587; 84 N. C. 434; 24 Cent. Dig. Tit. Fraudulent Conveyances 63; 20 Cyc. 655; 119 Ga. 793; 20 Cyc. 763; 7 Colo. App. 483; 73 Ga. 716; 71 Iowa 333; 42 Iowa 84; 119 Mich. 592; 98 Mich. 70; 43 Oreg. 260; 53 Wis. 410; 24…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court wras delivered by
Mr. Justice Gage.
Ginn-was owner of certain town lots; Ginn conveyed by deed to Faust; Faust conveyed by deed to Smith; the deed last named was in fact made to secure a debt, and was, therefore, a mortgage; the deed first named was made by Ginn without consideration with a fraudulent intent, and to avoid the payment of Ginn’s debt. These facts were alleged in the pleadings, and their truth was admitted before the master. The master made his report upon these facts, without swearing a witness. The master found in favor of Smith’s mortgage, and against…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Epworth Orphanage of the South Carolina Conference v. StrangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. PalmerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933