Darrohn v. Hildebrand (In Re Darrohn)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
In this direct appeal from the bankruptcy court, we are called upon to interpret a provision of Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code that requires debtors to commit their “projected disposable income” to the repayment of unsecured claims. The Bankruptcy Code defines projected disposable income by requiring calculation of a debt- or’s current monthly income less certain reasonably necessary expenses. Henry Hildebrand, III, trustee in bankruptcy (“Trustee”), brings this appeal and claims error in the bankruptcy court’s approval of David and Marguerite Darrohn’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Schultz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Shaw v. Aurgroup Financial Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Morse v. RudlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
3Cited by19 opinions
- Baud v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Deborah Seafort v. Beverly BurdenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Burden v. Seafort (In Re Seafort)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- In Re WengerdBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Coffin v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Coffin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.