Legal Opinion

Baugher v. Harman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 18, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Augusta county in' an action of trespass on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This action was brought by the defendant in error, Harman, to recover of the plaintiff in error, Baugher, damages for personal injuries which are alleged to have resulted from the defendant’s negligence.

The essential charges in the declaration are that the plaintiff was standing in front of a horse holding it by the rein, while the animal was being hitched to a buck-board by the owner and an assistant on Central avenue in the city of Staunton; that the defendant came along the avenue in an automobile, at sight of which the animal, being in plain view of the defendant, gave evidences of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consumers' Brewing Co. v. Doyle's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Cromer's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. McDonald's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  4. Northington v. Norfolk Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  5. Berkley Street Railway Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Clise v. PruntyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Adams Express Co. v. Allendale Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  4. Steele's Administrator v. Colonial Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API