Legal Opinion

Franklin Water, Light & Power Co. v. Rouse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 1893No. 787PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The errors assigned are:

1. The court erred in overruling the demurrers to the first and second paragraphs of the complaint.

2. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The first error assigned has been waived by the failure to discuss it.

The reasons assigned in the motion for a new trial are:

1. That the damages assessed by the court in said cause are excessive.

2. The assessment of the amount of recovery is erroneous, being too large.

3. The decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

4. The decision of the court is contrary to law.

The cause was tried by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gish v. GishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Miller v. BlueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Grabowski v. BenzsaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Reid v. Town of SullivanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API