Legal Opinion

Sada v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 28, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and negligence, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Battaglia, J.), dated January 7, 2010, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted that branch of the plaintiffs cross motion which was to impose sanctions based on spoliation of evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion *1122for summary judgment dismissing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Denoyelles v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Richardson v. New York UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Conteh v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Restrepo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. Malcolm v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Malcolm v. Rite Aid of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API