Fiore v. Ladd
Oregon Supreme Court
Appeal from Multnomah: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Action by-Severio Fiore against the firm of Ladd & Tilton to recover money. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. J ustice Bean.
This is the second appeal in this case. The facts are sufficiently detailed in 22 Or. 202, 29 Pac. 485, and need not be repeated here. On the second trial, in which the evidence was substantially the same as on the first, the court read from the former opinion, as its entire charge to the jury, the three proposed instructions numbered one, two, and three, for the refusal to give which a new trial was ordered, and, although repeatedly requested by plaintiff’s counsel, refused to instruct upon his theory of the case, or as to the law applicable to the facts which his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fiore v. Ladd & TiltonOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Winchester v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Willis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by10 opinions
- Denton v. ArnsteinOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Farmers' National Bank v. WoodellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- Spurrier Lumber Co. v. DodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.