Sky Valley Ltd. Partnership v. ATX Sky Valley, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
For reasons stated herein, ATX’s motion to dismiss this complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction is denied. ATX’s motion to transfer this case to the Northern District of California is granted.
I. FACTS
The plaintiff, Sky Valley Limited Partnership (“Sky Valley”) is a limited partnership formed solely to acquire and develop the Sky Valley Project (“the project”), a massive real estate acquisition and development project located in Vallejo, California. It is an Illinois corporation with its offices in Elk Grove Village, Illinois. Its sole limited partner is Tang,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Lakeside Bridge & Steel Co. v. Mountain State Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vandeveld v. ChristophDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Graff v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Weis v. Kimsaprincess Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Nelson v. Soo Line RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Ful Inc. v. Unified School District Number 204District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.