Bellomy's adm'r v. Bellomy
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 34 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL PROM TODD CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 B. Monroe, 62; Jones vs. Everman. • 15 B. Monroe, 633; Mar aman vs. Turnell. S Metcalfe, 146. CITED— 7 J. J. M., 147; Fitts'vs. Brown’s adm’r. 3 Mon., 358; Graves vs. Downey. 5 Mon., 20; Slaughter vs. Froman.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON'
delivered tiie opinion of the court:
Penick, as administrator of Bellomy, having, by a proper proceeding, procured the sale of land to pay a debt due to his intestate as vendor of the land on which he held a lien, the notes of Glass, as purchaser at that *110sale, like the notes for paying which the land was sold at the administrator’s instance, were personal assets in his hands as administrator; and Glass’s notes, never having been collected or otherwise disposed of, were unadministered assets, which the appellant, as administrator de bonis non after Penick’s death, had a right to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Suit v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897