Conner v. State

The defendant was convicted of the offense of having in his possession a still, etc., and he appeals.

There was no error in overruling appellant’s motion to quash, or his demurrers to, the indictment. , Code 1907, §§ 7132. and 7161; Local Acts 1919, p. 62; Hardeman v. State, 19 Ala. App. 563, 99 So. 53.

The ingenuity and industry displayed by appellant’s counsel command our admiration. Bpt, in the view we take of the case, their efforts are unavailing. Almost innumerable exceptions were reserved to rulings of the trial court by the defendant, all of which have been critically examined by us. In…