Legal Opinion

Buttolph v. Erikkson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 3, 1993No. 92-059PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the superior court finding that defendants had established a prescriptive right to use a driveway which passed over a corner of plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs also appeal the court’s ruling that the roadway to which the disputed driveway led was a public way, and contend that the court’s findings and conclusion of law regarding the public way should be stricken because the matter was not raised in the pleadings and not briefed by the parties. We affirm.

Plaintiffs first claim that it was reversible error for the trial court to find that defendants had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Community Feed Store, Inc. v. Northeastern Culvert Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. Fuller v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  4. Laird Properties New England Land Syndicate v. Mad River Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973
  5. Russell v. PareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guibord v. ScholtzSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  2. Wells v. RouleauSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. schmidt v. essVermont Superior Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API