Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dow v. Graham

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1928No. 3304Published

1Opinion

The argument on this motion is directed to the single point that "the court of equity had no jurisdiction to entertain this cause of action." It is presented under three propositions, namely:

"A. A county is an involuntary political or civil division of the state, subject at all times to control by the Legislature, owning no property in a private or proprietary capacity.
"B. Courts will not interfere by injunction with the exercise of legislative or political functions.
"C. Quo warranto is the exclusive remedy to test the legality of the organization of Rio Grande county."

[4] We cannot admit the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frantz v. AutrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Vanderburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Northwestern Colonization & Improvement Co. v. HullerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Shore v. Bd. of Ed., Town of CrescentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Guadalupe Co. Com'rs v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API