Legal Opinion

People v. Gutierrez

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1994No. B066651PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (Fred), J.

We disagree with People v. Santos (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 723 [271 Cal.Rptr. 811] and hold that the intent required in the use of “force . . . likely to produce great bodily injury” (Pen. Code, § 667.7, subd. (a)) is a general intent.

*1579In a three-phase trial, a jury first found Vincent Gutierrez (appellant) guilty of second degree murder (Pen. Code,1 § 187; count I), assault with a firearm (§ 245, subd. (a)(2); count III), and possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 12021, subd. (a); count IV) but not guilty of attempted murder (§§ 664/187; count II). Firearm use allegations…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. People v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. MaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. OlguinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API