Commonwealth v. Saldana
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
After a Superior Court jury trial, the defendant, Luis Saldana, was convicted of three offenses involving the illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition.2 On appeal, the defendant contends that: (1) the motion judge improperly denied the defendant's motion to suppress the showup identification; (2) the trial judge failed to give a proper jury instruction regarding the showup identification; (3) the prosecutor made improper comments in his closing argument; and (4) there was insufficient evidence to support the defendant's convictions. We affirm.
1. Motion to suppress. We recite the motion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Jones-PannellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Commonwealth v. AndersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.