Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1919No. L. A. No. 5273PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to terminate an agreement in writing by which Jennie B. Wilson entered into a contract with plaintiff to lease certain property with the privilege of purchase. Edward A. Wilson is made a party to the action because he is the husband of said Jennie B. Wilson.

The instrument on which the action was founded is called a “Lease with Privilege of Purchase.” It relates to lot thirty-seven, tract No. 1798, as per map recorded in book 21, page 40 of maps, records of the county of Los Angeles. The term is for one hundred and twenty…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kenney v. Los Feliz Investment Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Bradford v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. First National Bank v. Appalachian Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. DeVilliers v. BalcombNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API