Legal Opinion

Allen v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 21, 2000No. Civ. 00-40079, No. Crim. 97-50021-03PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255

GADOLA, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is petitioner Jewell Lamont Allen’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed February 22, 2000. The instant motion is based upon petitioner’s claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of the Sixth Amendment prior to his Rule 11 plea agreement. In addition, petitioner argues that his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm pursuant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dushon Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. Schneider v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
  2. United States v. WheelerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API