Legal Opinion

Parmar v. Madigan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2018No. Docket 122265UnpublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

¶ 1 Plaintiff, Paminder S. Parmar, individually and as executor of the estate of Surinder K. Parmar, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Du Page County against defendants, the Attorney General and the Treasurer of the State of Illinois, *1006 challenging the application and constitutionality of an amendment to the Illinois Estate and Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Act (Estate Tax Act) ( 35 ILCS 405/1 et seq. (West 2014) ) and seeking a refund of all moneys paid to the Treasurer pursuant to the Estate Tax Act. The circuit court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Healy v. VaupelIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. King v. First Capital Financial Services Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Sass v. KramerIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  5. City of Springfield v. AllphinIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Parmar v. MadiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  2. T. S. v. County of CookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Lavery v. Department of Financial and Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Flanigan v. The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois at ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  5. Bernard v. Illinois Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API