Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered October 4, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, denied defendant Rosen’s motion to consolidate this action with the summary proceeding pending between the parties in Civil Court, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly exercised its discretion in refusing to consolidate this Supreme Court action, which is not yet at the discovery stage, with a pending Civil Court summary proceeding that has already been placed on the trial calendar (see Barnes v Cathers & Dembrosky, 5 AD3d 122…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Abrams v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Barnes v. Cathers & DembroskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API