Legal Opinion

Armbruster v. Harrison

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1927No. 20311PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This cause was a malpractice suit filed in the court of common pleas of Henry county, Ohio, and was therefore required to be commenced within one year after the cause of action accrued, under the statute of limitations governing the same. The suit was in fact filed only three days before the period of limitation, and a summons issued the same day, to-wit, February 18, 1926, and service was made by the sheriff and returned and filed by him all on the same day, to-wit, February 18. The service was defectively made, and thereupon, on March 13, 1926, defendant filed motion to quash,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mary Grooms v. Greyhound CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Bloom v. HolzhauerOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Sunday Creek Coal Co. v. WestOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Sexton v. New York Central RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Bender v. BenderOhio Court of Appeals · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API