Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Horace State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 9, 1932No. 30,389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a board of county commissioners as a depositor in a failed bánk, against the receiver of the bank. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and plaintiff appeals. The demurrer was sustained because of noncompliance with R. S. 1930 Supp. 9-130, which reads:

“All claims of depositors and other creditors must be filed with the receiver within one year after the date of his appointment, and if not so filed such claims shall be barred from participation in the estate of such bank.”

The county owed the Road Supply and Metal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Collamore v. WilderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. City of Osawatomie v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  3. In re the Estate of JacobSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  5. McDaniel v. PutnamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. City of Lawrence v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  4. Morrison v. Bank of RupertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API