Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bowles

Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1944No. 146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAWS, Judge.

The question presented in this case is whether complainant’s situation as a landlord falls within Section 5(a) (3) of the Rent Regulation for Housing,1 which provides that individual landlords may have the right to upward adjustments of their maximum rents when: “There has been a substantial increase in the services * * * provided with the housing accommodations since the date or order determining its maximum rent.”

In September 1938 complainant, owner of a house in New London, Connecticut, leased his premises, including a shed, under a tenancy at will, at a rental of $20 per…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woods v. Forest Hills South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Veillette v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Absar Realty Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Jacob Goodman & Co. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Roumel v. GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API