Johnson v. Bowles
Emergency Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAWS, Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether complainant’s situation as a landlord falls within Section 5(a) (3) of the Rent Regulation for Housing,1 which provides that individual landlords may have the right to upward adjustments of their maximum rents when: “There has been a substantial increase in the services * * * provided with the housing accommodations since the date or order determining its maximum rent.”
In September 1938 complainant, owner of a house in New London, Connecticut, leased his premises, including a shed, under a tenancy at will, at a rental of $20 per…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- O'Brien v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. Forest Hills South, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Veillette v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Absar Realty Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
- Jacob Goodman & Co. v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
- Roumel v. GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.