Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1932No. 8 Div. 366Published

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The suit was for injunction, and was dissolved on motion.

The motion to dissolve the injunction against the threatened trespass was improperly granted. The cases cited are' different in that there was no question of insolvency of the defendant, as is averred in the instant bill. The authorities adverted to are: Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co., 198 Ala. 236, 73 So. 486, L. R. A. 1917C, 232, timber cutting case, as are also H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. Cullman Property Co., 189 Ala. 16, 66 So. 720, and Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co., 201 Ala. 150, 77 So. 574; Acker v. Green, 216 Ala.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cullman Property Co. v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. Cullman Property Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  5. Acker v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API