Legal Opinion

IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PRIVACY LITIGATION

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 26, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02155Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 Case No. 20-CV-02155-LHK IN RE: ZOOM VIDEO 13 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ COMMUNICATIONS INC. PRIVACY MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NON- 14 DISPOSITIVE ORDER OF LITIGATION MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 Re: Dkt. No. 142 16 17 18 On December 7, 2020, the parties briefed United States Magistrate Judge Susan van 19 Keulen on whether the protective order in this litigation should include a certain provision from 20 this district’s Model Protective Order for Litigation Involving Patents, Highly Sensitive 21…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craig John Maisonville, and James M. Dombroski v. F2 America, Inc. F2 International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Lance Ian Osband v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Milton Lewis v. Robert AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API