A. Hollander Son v. Jos. Hollander
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
A. Hollander Son, Incorporated, a corporation, complainant, Jos. Hollander, Incorporated, a corporation, and Joseph Hollander, defendants, are engaged in a business where both corporations receive raw skins or furs from others, subject these skins or furs to certain skilled processes and thus produce finished furs for conversion into wearing apparel.
This suit is brought to enjoin the defendant corporation and Joseph Hollander from using the name "Hollander" either alone or as a component part of any trade name in the business of dressing and dyeing furs; using the letter "J" in connection…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Citizens Coach Co. v. Camden Horse RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
- Cape May Yacht Club v. Cape May Yacht & Country ClubNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Consolidated Home Specialties Co. v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- American Shops, Inc. v. AM. FASHION, & C., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Boost Co. v. FaunceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- A. Hollander & Son, Inc. v. Jos. Hollander, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Rhea v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.