Castro Decorators, Inc. v. Bebry Bedding Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff instituted the above entitled actions, now consolidated, for infringement of a patent and breach of an oral supply agreement. The defendant, Bebry Bedding Corporation, is a manufacturer of beds and the defendant, R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., was a customer of Bebry and a retailer of the accused prod-duct.
The defendant Bebry counterclaims for infringement of its patent, breach of the supply agreement and for unfair competition.
The subject matter of each patent is a convertible hassock and bed, otherwise described as a convertible footstool (or ottoman) and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Springfield Boiler Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Waring Products Corp. v. Landers, Frary & ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
3Cited by2 opinions
- Castro Convertible Corporation v. Bebry Bedding Corporation, Castro Convertible Corporation v. R. H. MacY & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Castro Convertible Corporation v. Bebry Bedding Corporation, Castro Convertible Corporation v. R. H. MacY & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961