Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Williams v. . McRackan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.

There was motion before clerk of said county for change of venue to the county of Columbus. The clerk having denied the motion, on appeal his Honor ordered the removal as a matter of right on the ground that the action involved the determination of a right or interest in realty. Thereupon plaintiff excepted and appealed. Our statute, C. S., sec. 463, subsec. 1, provides that actions for recovery of real property or of an estate or interest therein, or for the determination in any form of such right or interest, and for injuries to real property, shall be tried in the county in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Councill v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Wofford-Fain & Co. v. HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Vaughan v. . FallinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodges v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Ridge Community Investors, Inc. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Goodyear Mortgage Corp. v. Montclair Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  4. English v. . BrigmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API