Legal Opinion

Whitman v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1979No. Civ. 52617PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REA, J. *

Petitioners appeal from a judgment of the superior court denying their petition for extraordinaiy relief in the nature of mandamus and/or prohibition against the Board of Supervisors of Ventura County (the Board) for unlawfully and wrongfully granting a conditional use permit to Phoenix West Oil and Gas Corporation (Phoenix), the real party in interest. 1

Statement of the Case

On June 27, 1975, Phoenix filed an application for a conditional use permit (CUP) to drill a single exploratory oil and gas well in the so-called Sisar Creek area of the Upper Ojai Valley in Ventura…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Bozung v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Al Larson Boat Shop, Inc. v. Board of Harbor CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API