Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided September 18, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable Ernestive V. Glossbrenner Chairperson House Public Education Committee P.O. Box 2910 Capitol Bldg., Room 302D Austin, Texas 78768-2910

Re: Use of a "paging device" on school property or at a school function (RQ-1942)

Dear Representative Glossbrenner:

You ask whether a car telephone is a "paging device" for purposes of section 21.309 of the Education Code, which provides as follows:(a) A student in a public school may not possess a paging device while on school property or while attending a school-sponsored or school-related activity on or off school property, unless the student is in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Texarkana Independent School District v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Valcarcel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API