Legal Opinion

Springfield Township v. Quick

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act. It originated in the county of Franklin, before the judge of the fourth judicial circuit of the State of Indiana, and was called a civil action.

Read the full summary

This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana by a writ of error, issued under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act. It originated in the county of Franklin, before the judge of the fourth judicial circuit of the State of Indiana, and was called a civil action. Springfield township filed a eomplai nt against Quick, the auditor*, and Robeson, the treasurer, of Franklin county, alleging that they had in their hands a certain sum of money, which they were about to distribute erroneously, and praying for an injunction to prohibit them from making the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Catron

The twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act- declares, that where is drawn in question the construction of any statute of the United States, and the decision is against the right set up or claimed by either party under the act of Congress, such decision may be re-examined, and reversed or affirmed, in the Supreme Court, on writ of error.

Here it is claimed, for the inhabitants of the township, that the fund arising''from the-proceeds of the sixteenth section shall not be estimated in distributing.the general school fund óf the State derived from taxes paid info the State treasury. The acts…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Springfield Township, of Franklin County, in Error v. John H. Quick, Auditor, and William Robeson, Treasurer, of Franklin CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API