Legal Opinion

Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Zoll Medical Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 8, 2016No. Civil Action Nos. 10-11041-NMGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

Gorton, United States District Judge

In this bifurcated patent infringement case defendant Zoll Medical Corporation (“Zoll”) moves to postpone the trial on damages scheduled for July, 2017 because of the prolonged reexamination of the subject patents in the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). Zoll also moves to set deadlines for plaintiffs Koninklijke Philips, N.V. and Philips Electronics North America Corporation (collectively, “Philips”) to seek leave to file amended or new expert damage reports. For the reasons that follow, both motions will be denied.

I. Background

This…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Vineberg v. BissonnetteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  4. Englishtown, Inc. v. Rosetta Stone Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  5. MAZ Partners LP v. ShearDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API