Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State ex rel. Burnett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 7, 1954No. 36224PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court and on December 28, 1953, filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okl. 273, 21 P.2d 1056, and Data v. Ghigo & Co., 192 Okl. 445, 137 P.2d 556, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but the judgment may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Osborne v. OsborneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Data v. Ghigo & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. SampsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Loveless v. HollowaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Mulkey v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API