Legal Opinion

Bakman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1976No. Civ. 2951Published

Fadem, Berger & McIntire, Michael M. Berger, Michael V. McIntire and Lerrigo, Thuesen, Walters, Nibler & Hendrick for Petitioners.

1Opinion of the Court

63 Cal.App.3d 306 (1976)

133 Cal. Rptr. 703

ERNEST J. BAKMAN et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; CITY OF FRESNO, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. 2951.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

November 2, 1976.

COUNSEL

Fadem, Berger & McIntire, Michael M. Berger, Michael V. McIntire and Lerrigo, Thuesen, Walters, Nibler & Hendrick for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Spencer Thomas, Jr., City Attorney, James A. McKelvey, Chief Assistant City Attorney, A.H. Einbinder, Deputy City Attorney, Hoge, Fenton, Jones & Appel, Charles H. Brock, and H.R.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bates v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API