State v. Dimeo
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). He contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of his telephone conversations with a police informant and the cocaine seized during a search of his car pursuant to a warrant.1 We affirm.
Officer Wade arrested John McEachern for possession and conspiracy to deliver cocaine. Police seized a pound of cocaine from him. Wade and Sergeant May questioned him. He gave written consent for a search of his house, freely admitting that there was marijuana there,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DimeoOregon Supreme Court · 1987