Legal Opinion

State v. Dimeo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1987No. 84-1088; CA A40044PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for possession and conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). He contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of his telephone conversations with a police informant and the cocaine seized during a search of his car pursuant to a warrant.1 We affirm.

Officer Wade arrested John McEachern for possession and conspiracy to deliver cocaine. Police seized a pound of cocaine from him. Wade and Sergeant May questioned him. He gave written consent for a search of his house, freely admitting that there was marijuana there,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. VillagranOregon Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DimeoOregon Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API