Legal Opinion
People v. Nahman
New York City Magistrates' Court
Decided May 10, 1946PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Simmons, M.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss complaints charging them with violation of section .21 of article III of the Riiles and Regulations of the Department of Parks of New York City. By stipulation of the parties it was agreed that the testimony taken in the proceeding against Benjamin Nah-man be considered the testimony in the twelve other eases and the decision of the court thereon be binding on the twelve other defendants. The basis of the charge is that at noon of March 15, 1946, while Winston Churchill, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, was entering the City…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thomas v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Kearny v. MUN. SAN. LANDFILL AUTH.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976