Legal Opinion

Monroe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 21, 2007No. 1D06-3380PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of an order revoking his probation. Following an evi-dentiary hearing, the trial court found that appellant had violated condition 7 of his probation by not “work[ing] diligently at a lawful occupation,” and condition 18 by “viewing], own[ing] or possess[ing] any obscene, pornographic, or sexually explicit ... material.” Accordingly, the trial court revoked appellant’s probation and sentenced him to ten years in prison. We have reviewed the photographs that supported the trial court’s finding that appellant had violated condition 18 and conclude that no reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Perez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Llerena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API