Legal Opinion

State v. McLeod

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 29, 2018No. 20151060-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAGEN, Judge:

¶1 Ty William McLeod appeals the district court's denial of his motion to suppress drug and paraphernalia possession evidence discovered during a traffic stop. The district court determined that the officers did not have reasonable suspicion to extend the detention. However, it denied the motion to suppress because the length of McLeod's detention did not exceed the amount of time reasonably necessary to complete an ordinary traffic stop. On appeal, the State concedes that the "denial of the suppression motion appears to have been based on an incorrect understanding of the law"…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GuerroCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  2. Evolocity, Inc. v. Department of Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. State v. MalloyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. State v. McLeod.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API