Clay v. Keiser
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
This is an equitable action to impress certain shares of stock in the possession of appellant with a constructive trust and compel assignment of those shares to appellee. The chancellor granted the requested relief and his decree was confirmed by the court en banc. This appeal ensued. 1
Appellant challenges the chancellor’s conclusions that a tenancy by the entireties was created when the stock was placed in the names of both spouses and that the subsequent retransfer to appellant created a resulting trust for the benefit of appellee. Such matters turn…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Berhalter v. BerhalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Chambers v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Holmes EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Stemniski v. StemniskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Butler v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.