Legal Opinion

In Re Forlenza

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2004No. 03-0299PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

After the trial court in this case made an initial child-custody determination, the children lived with their custodial parent in four different states over a five and one-half year period while the non-custodial parent remained in Texas. In this modification suit, we must decide whether significant connections with Texas exist or substantial evidence is available here such that the initial trial court retained exclusive continuing jurisdiction under section 152.202(a)(1) of the Texas Family Code. Based on the record presented, we hold that the trial court retained exclusive continuing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McIntyre v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Geary v. PeavyTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Benson v. BensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. M.B. v. M.B.New York Family Court · 2002

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Powell v. StoverTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. SunBridge Healthcare Corp. v. Penny, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  4. Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  5. City of Austin v. Utility Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API