Legal Opinion

Scott v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 2, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00098Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION KAMUNDE A. SCOTT, ) ) Movant, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-CV-00098 JAR ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Movant’s motion for appointment of counsel in his action to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. No. 7). It is well established that a movant in a § 2255 proceeding has no constitutional right to appointment of counsel. United States v. Craycraft,

167 F.3d 451, 455

(8th Cir. 1999). The appointment of counsel in a § 2255…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Brett Aaron NELSON, Appellant, v. REDFIELD LITHOGRAPH PRINTING, Sam Demere, and Paul Roach, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Michael Lloyd CraycraftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Albert Joseph Degand, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. Ralph Melton Fleming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API