Hale v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana.
1Per curiam
In the Supreme Court of the state of Louisiana the liability of an employer to an employé for damages resulting from the negligence of a co-employé or fellow servant is considered a question of general law and not controlled by any express statute. See Hubgh v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. R. Co., 6 La. Ann. 495, 54 Am. Dec. 565; Satterly v. Morgan, 35 La. Ann. 1166; Towns v. Railroad Co., 37 La. Ann. 630, 55 Am. Rep. 508; Wallis v. Railroad & Steamship Co., 38 La. Ann. 160; Dandie v. Railroad Co., 42 La. Ann. 689, 7 South. 792; Bell v. Lumber Co., 107 La. 725, 31 South. 994. In Mexican…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Hubgh v. New Orleans & Carrollton RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
- Bell v. Globe Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Towns v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1906