Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Trujillo v. Beaty Elec. Co., Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1978No. 3050Published

1ConcurrenceSutin, Judge

(specially concurring).

I concur.

A. Lawyers should read and follow Rule 9(m) on “Statement of Proceedings.”

Defendant’s Statement of Proceedings contains 13 pages of facts, evidence, and argument. Rule 9(m) of the Rules Governing Appeals [§ 21-12-9(m), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl. Vol. 4,1975 Supp.)] reads in pertinent part:

The statement of proceedings shall contain the following:(1) A brief summary of such portions of the pleadings and rulings of the court thereon as are necessary to an understanding of the issues material to the review. .(2) If the trial court has made findings of facts, a concise…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Montano v. SaavedraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Lyon v. Catron County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Ross v. Sayers Well Servicing CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Gammon v. Ebasco Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API