Boettiger v. Weber
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 13, April T., 1914, bv deiendant, from judgment of C. P. Erie Co., Nov. T., 1911, No. 79, on verdict for plaintiff in case of George W. Boettiger v. Ferdinand Weber. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before Walling, P. J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $154.62. Defendant appealed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was in refusing to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
It appears by the mechanic’s lien in question that the plumbing for which it was filed was done by the plaintiff, a subcontractor, “in and about the erection” of a. building, describing it. In fact, the work was done in *466the enlargement and reconstruction of a dwelling house. The court and counsel for both parties substantially agree in their description of the building before and after reconstruction. The following, with very slight changes, is taken from the opinion of the learned judge overruling the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Prior to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Warren v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Norris's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
- Armstrong v. WareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
- Malone v. HosfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anastasi v. BrunetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Huber v. RossellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Lapidus v. Wellenbach, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1956