Legal Opinion

Brennan v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided October 9, 1970No. Claim No. 39467PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSidney Squibb, J.

As this case was being reached for trial, the defendant moved for an order granting summary judgment in its favor because “ the Doctrine of Collateral Estoppel applies”. In opposition, the claimant maintains that this legal principle cannot be used effectively as a sword against her right to a trial of the issues herein.

The movant’s posture is predicated on a judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, in the consolidated action wherein this claimant and another were plaintiffs and Gull Contracting Co., Inc., Tully & DiNapoli, Inc. and the City of New York were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. B. R. DeWitt, Inc. v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Albero v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brennan v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API