Legal Opinion
Olmosperez v. Evans
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 22, 2015PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs (see Matter of Linares v Evans, 26 NY3d 1012 [2015] [decided today]; Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000]).
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, Rivera, AbdusSalaam and Fahey concur; Judge Stein taking no part.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF SILMON v. TravisNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- The Matter of Jorge L. Linares v. Andrea W. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of Huntley v. StanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Mullins v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mullins v. New York State Board of ParoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016