Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Flynn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 764PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant was convicted by a jury of attempted murder,1 robbery,2 and related offenses. Appellant raises numerous allegations of error; we believe that two of those allegations have merit. First, we believe that the trial court abused its discretion in not granting a continuance so that appellant’s Public Defender would have adequate time to prepare the defense. Second, we also believe that the Commonwealth abridged appellant’s constitutional right to remain silent. Consequently, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.

On August 9, 1974, appellant was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Richter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. LoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. RhemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. WhitmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. CarrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API