Legal Opinion
Rome-Floyd Residents Ass'n v. County of Oneida
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, the Rome-Floyd Residents Association, Inc., appeal from a dismissal of their CPLR article 78 proceeding in which they seek the annulment of certain resolutions passed by the Oneida County Board of Legislators concerning a resource recovery facility to be located near Griffiss Air Force Base in the outskirts of Rome. It is petitioners’ claim that the actions taken were invalid because no environmental impact statement had been prepared for the project (see Matter of Tri-County Taxpayers Assn. v Town Bd. of Town…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Tri-County Taxpayers Ass'n v. Town Board of QueensburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Chemical Bank v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Chemical Bank v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Vanderlex Merchandise Co.New York Supreme Court · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horne v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fay v. ButcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989