Legal Opinion

Universal Road MacHinery Co. v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

On July 24th, 1924, the plaintiff, a New York corporation, and the Karm Terminal Coal Com pany, organized under the laws of Connecticut and located at Bridgeport, entered into a contract for the purchase by the latter from the former of certain coal machinery. The terms of the contract were contained in a certain writing conceded to be in legal effect a conditional bill of sale. It appears from the record that the purchase price was to be $2,396. Of the amount, $200 was paid when the order for the machinery was given, $200 was to be paid upon the arrival of the machinery at its destination,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bayley v. GreenleafSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  4. Lyon v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  5. Watson v. WellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duparquet, Huot & Meneuse Co. v. MaguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. B. C. S. Corp. v. AbbottConnecticut Superior Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API