Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Hance

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1902No. S.F. No. 3325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

WRIT OF MANDATE from the Supreme Court to the City Clerk of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is a petition of the city of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, city clerk of said city, to sign and certify to the passage by the city council of the city of a certain ordinance calling a special election and submitting to the qualified voters of the city certain propositions for incurring municipal debts in the form of bonds, and to present the same to the mayor of the city for his approval. An alternative writ was issued, and on the return day the case was argued and submitted. The respondent bases his refusal to do the act demanded…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Taggart v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API