Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Franklin & Abbeville R. R. v. Allen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1900No. 13,658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

^ PPLICATION for writs of Mandamus, Prohibition and Certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Blanchard, J.

In November, 1897, the Franklin & Abbeville E. E. Co. filed suit against Donelson Caffery and obtained an order of injunction restraining him from obstructing the use and enjoyment of certain rights of way claimed by the company.

The suit lingered upon the docket until May, 1900, when defendant Caffery filed answer attacking the charter of the plaintiff corporation.

*302Thereupon, in September, 1900, the Caffery Central Sugar Refinery and R. R. Co., Limited, alleging' interest, intervened in the suit and joined the plaintiff in the prayer for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. O'Donnell v. TissotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  2. State ex rel. LeBlanc v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  3. Vidalat v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Bassetti v. Judge of the Second Recorder's CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cotton Growers' Co-Op. Ass'n v. BaconSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. In Re Louisiana Coastal Lands, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API